CEDIS Amicus-Advocacy Policy
Introduction
CEDIS recognizes the importance of contributing to the legal and policy discourse by providing expert opinions as amicus curiae or engaging in advocacy efforts that align with the CEDIS mission and expertise. This Amicus-Advocacy Policy outlines the principles governing such activities.
Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that CEDIS engages in amicus advocacy in a manner consistent with its mission, values, and commitment to intellectual rigor, independence, and objectivity.
Principles
- Mission Alignment: Amicus briefs and advocacy efforts will align with the mission and research focus areas of CEDIS.
- Independence and Objectivity: Amicus advocacy will be conducted impartially and without any undue influence from external parties. CEDIS will maintain its independence and objectivity in providing expert opinions.
- Legal and Ethical Compliance: All amicus briefs and advocacy activities will comply with applicable laws, regulations, and ethical standards.
- Peer Review: Where feasible, the research centere will subject its advocacy positions to internal peer review to ensure accuracy and reliability.
- Transparency: CEDIS will be transparent about its role as an amicus curiae or advocate, disclosing its affiliations, funding sources, and any potential conflicts of interest.
- Collaboration: CEDIS may collaborate with other reputable institutions, organizations, or experts to enhance the impact and credibility of its advocacy efforts.
Review and Revision
This Amicus-Advocacy Policy will be reviewed periodically and revised as necessary to ensure its continued effectiveness and relevance. We ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.